Recommendations for lung ventilation and perfusion assessment with chest electrical impedance tomography in critically ill adult patients.

Global Consensus on Electrical Impedance Tomography in Critical Care


🩺 Abstract

Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) is a non-invasive, radiation-free imaging technology that allows continuous bedside monitoring of lung ventilation and perfusion in critically ill patients. Despite its increasing use, standardized international guidelines have been lacking. This large-scale Delphi consensus study—led by the REspiratory and Critical Care Medicine EIT (RECCE) group—reviewed over 11,000 studies and formulated 87 recommendations, covering data acquisition, analysis, clinical application, and future directions. Consensus was achieved on 85 statements (15 with >95% agreement), offering the first global evidence-based framework for EIT in adult critical care. These recommendations strengthen the role of EIT in PEEP titration, lung recruitability assessment, ECMO management, and detection of ventilation-perfusion mismatches, marking a milestone in the global standardization of bedside functional lung imaging.


🔍 10 Key Insights:


1️⃣ EIT as a Bedside Functional Imaging Tool: EIT provides continuous, radiation-free assessment of regional ventilation and perfusion, enabling detection of dynamic pulmonary changes, V/Q mismatch, and recruitment in real time. It bridges the gap between imaging and physiological monitoring in the ICU.

2️⃣ Scope and Methodology of the Consensus: An international panel of intensivists, biomedical engineers, and physiologists reviewed 11,159 abstracts and 242 eligible publications (1990–2024). Using Oxford’s Levels of Evidence and a two-round Delphi process, 87 recommendations were finalized with robust global agreement across 12 countries.

3️⃣ Core Recommendations on Data Acquisition:

  • Electrode placement: Preferably at the 4th–5th intercostal spaces, adjusted for diaphragm position.
  • Consistency: Identical EIT-belt positioning is essential for repeated measurements.
  • Obesity and contact impedance: While body habitus alters lung contour, it does not hinder EIT’s ability to monitor ventilation dynamically.

4️⃣ Standardization of Analysis and Key Metrics: Strong consensus supports standardized use of indices such as:

  • End-expiratory lung impedance (EELI) to reflect volume changes.
  • Tidal impedance variation (TIV) as a surrogate for tidal volume.
  • Center of Ventilation (CoV) and Global Inhomogeneity Index (GI) for spatial ventilation patterns. Calibration with known tidal volume is advised before comparing datasets.

5️⃣ PEEP and Tidal Volume Optimization: EIT allows individualized PEEP titration using regional compliance (Costa method), identifying the crossover between overdistension and collapse. The technique enables real-time evaluation of recruitment maneuvers and quantifies hyper-distension, guiding lung-protective ventilation strategies.

6️⃣ Perfusion and V/Q Assessment: Contrast-enhanced EIT (hypertonic saline 5–10%) achieved consensus as the preferred method for regional perfusion mapping. Breath-holding for ≥8 seconds during acquisition optimizes signal quality. The technique can identify pulmonary embolism and regional perfusion defects—a breakthrough for functional hemodynamic imaging.

7️⃣ Clinical Applications: EIT is validated for:

  • ARDS and ALI: Detecting recruitment/de-recruitment and guiding ventilation.
  • Prone positioning: Quantifying dorsal recruitment and improved V/Q matching.
  • ECMO: Individualizing PEEP and tidal volume in both V-V and V-A ECMO settings.
  • Weaning trials: Monitoring regional ventilation shifts during spontaneous breathing.
  • Self-inflicted lung injury (P-SILI): Detecting pendelluft and patient effort heterogeneity.

8️⃣ Comparison to 2017 TREND Consensus: Unlike TREND (focused on methodology), the RECCE 2025 consensus emphasizes clinical translation. It expands beyond ventilation to integrate perfusion, rehabilitation applications, and emerging technologies such as 3D EIT and multi-layer electrode systems.

9️⃣ Evidence Limitations and Future Trials: Most statements are supported by moderate-level (B) or expert-based (D) evidence, with only 3 high-quality (A) recommendations. The authors call for multicenter RCTs to validate EIT-guided mechanical ventilation and perfusion imaging in ARDS and ECMO.

🔟 Training, Standardization, and Future Directions:

  • Mandatory EIT training for clinicians interpreting functional images.
  • Development of automated analysis and 3D imaging to enhance reproducibility.
  • Expansion of perfusion imaging protocols beyond saline bolus—potentially toward non-invasive cardiac-cycle calibration.
  • Establishment of EIT reference values across disease phenotypes.

Clinical Takeaways

  • EIT is no longer experimental—it is now endorsed by an international expert panel for real-time bedside assessment.
  • Enables personalized mechanical ventilation, V/Q evaluation, and physiologic monitoring during ECMO.
  • The technology’s integration into clinical protocols could reshape ARDS management, lung-protective ventilation, and early diagnosis of complications.

ACCESS FULL ARTICLE HERE

Discussion

As EIT transitions from research to real-world use—will it redefine how we titrate PEEP, detect V/Q mismatch, and individualize ventilation?

 

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Scroll to Top