Summary
This review extensively analyzes the physiological control mechanisms of ventilation and their interaction with mechanical ventilators, highlighting advanced technologies aimed at improving patient-ventilator synchrony. Ventilator dyssynchrony—defined as a mismatch between patient respiratory effort and ventilator support—remains prevalent, contributing significantly to adverse outcomes, including prolonged ventilation, diaphragm dysfunction, extended ICU stays, and increased mortality. The review emphasizes the need for clinician education, advanced monitoring techniques, and novel triggering methods (like esophageal pressure or electrical diaphragmatic activity) to improve patient outcomes.
Key Points:
-
Clinical Relevance of Dyssynchrony: Patient-ventilator dyssynchrony is a common ICU issue associated with adverse outcomes, including prolonged mechanical ventilation, diaphragm weakness, increased length of stay, and higher mortality rates.
-
Underlying Causes: Dyssynchronies arise due to complex interactions between patient respiratory efforts and ventilator settings. Factors contributing include inappropriate trigger sensitivity, respiratory mechanics, device malfunction, and clinician misunderstanding of ventilator waveforms.
-
Common Dyssynchronies: The most frequent types include triggering dyssynchronies (delayed, missed, auto, reverse triggers) and cycling dyssynchronies (early, delayed, work shifting), each with distinct clinical manifestations and waveform characteristics.
-
Monitoring Dyssynchrony: Dyssynchrony is primarily identified through careful interpretation of ventilator waveforms (pressure-time, flow-time curves). Advanced tools like esophageal pressure monitoring or electrical diaphragmatic activity (Edi) provide high precision but remain underutilized.
-
Asynchrony Index (AI): The Asynchrony Index is used to quantify dyssynchronies, calculated as the percentage of asynchronous breaths relative to the total number of breaths, helping clinicians assess the severity of mismatch and guiding interventions.
-
Educational Gaps Among Clinicians: An international quiz assessing clinician knowledge revealed an average score of only 60%, indicating substantial knowledge gaps regarding dyssynchrony recognition and management. This underscores the need for enhanced clinician training.
-
Triggering Innovations: Novel triggering methods, including neural triggering (Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist, NAVA) and smart triggering, improve ventilator responsiveness by directly aligning ventilator support with patient respiratory efforts.
-
Flow Patterns and Synchrony: Different inspiratory flow patterns (square, decelerating, sinusoidal) affect synchronization. Decelerating patterns may improve oxygenation and reduce ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI), though studies show mixed results regarding clinical advantages.
-
Artificial Intelligence (AI) Applications: Emerging AI-based software can detect and correct dyssynchronies in real-time, but such technologies have yet to be fully integrated into contemporary ventilators. Their potential could substantially enhance synchrony and patient outcomes.
-
Novel Ventilation Strategies: The authors propose utilizing esophageal pressure or electrical diaphragmatic activity signals for ventilator triggering and cycling, presenting a promising approach to significantly improve synchrony, particularly in patients with irregular respiratory patterns.
Conclusion
Optimizing patient-ventilator interactions is vital for reducing adverse clinical outcomes related to ventilator dyssynchronies. Achieving this requires a multi-faceted approach including clinician education, waveform analysis skills, and embracing advanced ventilatory technologies. Future research should focus on refining novel signal-based triggers and cycling mechanisms, leveraging real-time monitoring and artificial intelligence to tailor ventilation more closely to individual patient respiratory patterns, thus bridging the gap between mechanical ventilation and physiological respiratory control.
Watch the following video on “SEVA VentRounds Express: Cycle Synchrony” by Cleveland Clinic
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
