Summary of “Advances in achieving lung and diaphragm-protective ventilation”
Abstract
Mechanical ventilation, while lifesaving, poses risks to both lung and diaphragm integrity. This review discusses the latest evidence and technologies for monitoring and interventions that support the combined goal of lung- and diaphragm-protective ventilation (LDPV). It emphasizes noninvasive bedside strategies, optimal titration of ventilator support, and emerging techniques such as extracorporeal CO₂ removal, neuromechanical uncoupling, and phrenic nerve stimulation. The article calls for individualized care guided by physiologic insights and proposes a practical bedside protocol.
10 Key Points
-
Dual Threat of Mechanical Ventilation: Ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) and diaphragm disuse atrophy (VIDD) can occur simultaneously. Strategies must balance minimizing lung stress with preserving diaphragm activity.
-
Critical Monitoring Parameters: Noninvasive indices such as P0.1, Pocc, and pressure muscle index (PMI) effectively reflect patient effort and lung stress. Advanced methods include esophageal manometry, diaphragm ultrasound, and electrical impedance tomography (EIT).
-
Safe Target Ranges: The authors provide consensus-based thresholds for key respiratory variables (e.g., tidal volume, P0.1, Pocc, DPaw, DPL, TFdi) that help identify excessive effort, over-assistance, and lung stress.
-
Transition from Controlled to Assisted Ventilation: This period is especially vulnerable to patient-ventilator dyssynchrony and excessive diaphragm strain. Close monitoring and titration of sedation and inspiratory support are essential.
-
PEEP as a Modulator: PEEP adjustments can either reduce or exacerbate respiratory effort depending on lung mechanics. Improper PEEP may flatten the diaphragm or induce eccentric contractions, emphasizing the need for individualized titration.
-
Extracorporeal CO₂ Removal (ECCO₂R): Modulating sweep gas flow can reduce neural respiratory drive. While promising in early studies, ECCO₂R is best used adjunctively after optimizing other ventilator settings.
-
Partial Neuromuscular Blockade & Nerve Block: Low-dose rocuronium or phrenic nerve block can selectively uncouple diaphragmatic contraction from neural drive. While effective short-term, the safety of prolonged use remains uncertain.
-
Diaphragm Neurostimulation: Electrical or magnetic stimulation of the phrenic nerve is a promising but still experimental technique aimed at preventing disuse atrophy and improving regional lung aeration.
-
Bedside Protocol Using Pocc: A practical stepwise approach incorporates Pocc to estimate both lung stress and diaphragm effort, guiding adjustments in sedation and ventilatory support to remain within protective zones.
-
Call for Multi-Modal Interventions: Single interventions are insufficient. Combining monitoring with sedation management, ventilator titration, PEEP optimization, and—when needed—advanced techniques like ECCO₂R or stimulation provides the most promise for true LDPV.
Conclusion
Achieving lung- and diaphragm-protective ventilation is a dynamic, multifaceted process requiring individualized assessment and intervention. Success hinges on understanding the pathophysiologic balance between respiratory muscle activity and lung mechanics. Bedside tools such as Pocc and esophageal pressure monitoring, combined with rational adjustments in sedation, ventilator settings, and adjunctive support like ECCO₂R, may bridge the gap between physiologic targets and clinical feasibility. More prospective studies are needed to validate long-term outcomes of these strategies.
Watch the following video on “Lung- and Diaphragm- Protective Ventilation” by ICU REACH
Creative Commons
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. You are not required to obtain permission to reuse this article.
If an article is Open Access and published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) permission for reuse is not required. Before requesting permission, be sure to check the Copyright status of the source material and review which Creative Commons License applies to the publication, if any.

