Summary of “Assessing lung recruitability: does it help with PEEP settings?”
This editorial examines the relationship between lung recruitability and the selection of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) settings in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) management. While recruitability measures the potential to reinflate atelectatic lung regions, PEEP must prevent their collapse while considering additional factors like tidal volumes, elastance, and hemodynamics. The authors argue that recruitability alone is insufficient for PEEP personalization and advocate for a broader, integrated approach.
Key Points:
- Recruitment Process: Recruitment describes the inflation of atelectatic lung units during inspiration, requiring pressures of 25–30 cmH₂O, and is maintained by adequate PEEP.
- Recruitability Types: Includes the reaeration of gasless atelectasis and the improved inflation of poorly ventilated alveoli, assessed via imaging or gas-volume-based methods.
- PEEP’s Role: PEEP prevents the collapse of newly opened alveoli, but its level must exceed the closing threshold pressure while minimizing overdistension.
- Diagnostic Tools: Methods such as CT scans, electrical impedance tomography (EIT), and gas exchange metrics help assess recruitability but vary in accuracy and applicability.
- Challenges of PEEP Selection: Current guidelines lack precise rules for PEEP titration, especially for pressures >15 cmH₂O, which are associated with worse outcomes in some studies.
- Recruitability’s Limitations: Recruitability is an extensive property dependent on disease severity and lung weight, whereas PEEP levels are determined by the physical characteristics of alveoli.
- Integrated Management: Effective PEEP titration should include assessments of recruitability, tidal volumes, transpulmonary pressures, and hemodynamics.
- Clinical Implications: Using recruitability alone to set PEEP may cause injurious ventilatory settings, as PEEP requirements differ based on individual lung mechanics.
- Personalization Strategies: True PEEP personalization demands incorporating multiple physiological variables beyond recruitability to optimize outcomes.
- Guideline Alignment: The authors suggest aligning PEEP selection with updated ARDS guidelines that emphasize individualized respiratory support strategies.
Conclusion:
Lung recruitability provides valuable insights into ARDS severity but is insufficient for PEEP personalization. PEEP settings must be tailored using a combination of recruitability assessments, lung mechanics, and hemodynamic considerations to optimize ventilation and minimize injury.
Watch the follwing video on “Individualise Lung-Protective Ventilation in ICU” by ESICM
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
