
Abstract
Background
Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) use for cardiogenic shock (CS) is increasing worldwide despite conflicting results from randomized trials, which focused on myocardial-infarction related CS (MI-CS).
Methods
We performed a retrospective analysis of the Cardiogenic Shock Working Group (CSWG) multicenter registry to assess outcomes in CS in those supported with VA-ECMO. Continuous variables were presented as mean±SD or median+IQR for normal/non-normal distributions. Group comparisons used the t-test or Mann-Whitney U test for normal/non-normal data and chi-square test for proportions.
Results
Between 2019 and 2023, 1728 out of 11244 CS patients (15.3%) received VA-ECMO. Median age was 58 years, and 69.9% were male. Etiologies of shock were heart failure (HF-CS: 45%), myocardial infarction (MI-CS; 34%), and other-CS (22%). Mortality was 51% and higher for MI-CS (60% vs 42%, MI vs HF-CS, p<0.01). Heart replacement therapy was more common among HF-CS patients (24% vs. 7%, HF vs MI-CS, p<0.01); 71% and 43% of HF- and MI-CS underwent cardiac transplantation. VA-ECMO was placed in a non-OR site in 74% of patients, predominantly with peripheral cannulation (71%). Distal perfusion catheters were used in 34% of VA-ECMO cases. In 71% of patients >1 MCS device was used during hospitalization. Complications included acute limb ischemia (ALI: 14% overall, 10% vs. 17%, HF vs MI-CS, p<0.01), bleeding (53% overall, 47% vs. 56%, HF vs MI-CS, p<0.01), and stroke (13% overall, 10% vs. 16%, HF vs MI-CS, p<0.01).
Conclusions
Using a large contemporary real-world CS registry, we report high mortality and complication rates with VA-ECMO and further identified significant differences in outcomes between MI- and HF-CS. These findings may inform clinical practice, novel device development and future shock trial designs.
We use cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing to use our site, you agree to their use. Learn more