
Abstract
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in a venovenous configuration (VV-ECMO) is increasingly recognized as an important therapeutic option for patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).1 Accumulating scientific evidence as well as experience garnered during both the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) and coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemics, have resulted in widespread adoption of VV-ECMO for patients with ARDS.2–5 In this context, ECMO centers have expanded the application of VV-ECMO to other indications, including severe respiratory failure due to traumatic injury.6–8
The article by Niles et al.9 offers an important contribution to the field of ECMO for respiratory support in traumatically injured patients. In this single-center, retrospective cohort study, 75 patients with trauma-related acute respiratory failure were managed with VV-ECMO over an 8 year period. Pulmonary contusion was the most common etiology of respiratory failure (49% of patients) with aspiration (15%) and transfusion-related acute lung injury (11%) as other leading causes. Thirty-two percent of the patients experienced cardiac arrest before initiation of VV-ECMO and approximately 50% of patients had traumatic brain injury (TBI). Overall survival to hospital discharge was 68%. Thirty-eight (51%) patients received no anticoagulation during ECMO. Of the 37 patients who received systemic anticoagulation, 27 (73%) had anticoagulation infusion held at some point during the ECMO run. In multivariable logistic regression, there was no association between exposure to anticoagulation and survival.