
Abstract
Background
This study sought to examine the outcomes of percutaneous postclosure of large-bore femoral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) cannulas compared with a traditional open cutdown technique.
Methods
Between June 1, 2018 and December 31, 2023, a total of 103 unique consecutive patients underwent VA-ECMO, and 89 underwent subsequent decannulation by either open cutdown (n = 44) or percutaneous (n = 45) suture-mediated closure. The primary outcomes of interest were procedural success, vascular complications, and wound site infection after decannulation.
Results
Percutaneous postclosure was successful in 41 of 45 (91.1%) patients. In closure failures, 2 cannulas were inserted through the inguinal ligament, and 1 cannula involved the superficial femoral artery bifurcation. All failures were in patients with a body mass index ≥35 kg/m2. Percutaneous closures were associated with reduced rates of groin infection (2.4% vs 18.8%; P = .04). There was no statistical difference in the rate of vascular complications after percutaneous closure (7.3% vs 20.8%; P = .13). Among patients undergoing isolated decannulation procedures, operating room time was significantly lower for percutaneously decannulated patients (75 [SD28] minutes vs 143 [45] minutes; P < .0001).
Conclusions
Percutaneous decannulation of VA-ECMO sites can be achieved with high success rates and faster procedural time as well as lower groin infection rates when compared with a traditional open closure technique. Attention to detail at the time of cannulation is essential for successful decannulation.
We use cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing to use our site, you agree to their use. Learn more