Abstract
As transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) expands in use as an alternative to surgical AVR (SAVR) for patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis across a wide spectrum of surgical risk, which patients are still best served by SAVR?
That question is at the center of a comprehensive State of the Art Review recently published in the European Heart Journal by an international team of expert cardiologists and cardiothoracic surgeons.
We use cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing to use our site, you agree to their use. Learn more