
Abstract
Objectives
According to the manufacturer, the Hemochron ACT-LR cuvette is designated for heparin concentrations of 0 to 2.5 IU/mL, while the optimal concentration range for the ACT+ cartridge is 1 to 6 IU/mL. We hypothesized that at low to moderate heparin concentrations, the ACT-LR is more reliable than the ACT+.
Design
An in vitro study.
Setting
A tertiary care university hospital.
Participants
Twenty healthy adult volunteers.
Interventions
Donor blood samples were spiked with unfractionated heparin to concentrations of 0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 IU/mL. From each concentration, 3 measurements were made with each test cassette using 3 different Hemochron Signature Elite devices, for a total of 720 ACT tests. The Bland-Altman method and intraclass correlation coefficients were used to analyze the data.
Measurements and Main Results
All 360 ACT+ tests yielded a result. Of 360, 38 (11%) ACT-LR tests ran above the upper measurement range; of these, 36 were from the 120 measurements at heparin concentrations ≥2.0 IU/mL. The bias between all ACT-LR and ACT+ measurements was 52 (95% CI, 48-56) celite seconds, and the limits of agreement were wide. Based on the intraclass correlation coefficients, the reliability of ACT+ was better than or equal to that of ACT-LR.
Conclusions
The performance of ACT+ is equal to that of ACT-LR up to a concentration of 0.5 IU/mL, above which ACT+ is superior to ACT-LR, questioning the rationale for a specific low-range test. However, there is a significant bias between ACT-LR and ACT+ measurements that needs to be considered if switching from one test to the other.
We use cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing to use our site, you agree to their use. Learn more